By Kingsman – Almighty FM 103.7 Sports Desk
In a move set to reshape the future of international football, FIFA is seriously considering expanding the 2030 FIFA World Cup from 48 teams to 64 teams. The proposal, advanced by the South American football confederation CONMEBOL, is intended as a one-off celebration of the tournament’s 100th anniversary. If approved, it would mark the largest edition of the men’s World Cup ever.
📅 Background: What We Know
-
The 2030 World Cup is already scheduled to be hosted across six nations, spanning three continents: Spain, Portugal, Morocco (main hosts in Europe & Africa) plus Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay contributing to opening matches in South America. This format is to honour the centennial of the inaugural 1930 tournament held in Uruguay. Al Jazeera+2Reuters+2
-
The 2026 World Cup will be the first to feature 48 teams, increasing from 32 teams; the 2030 proposal would be a further expansion. Al Jazeera+1
-
The idea of 64 teams was initiated by CONMEBOL President Alejandro Domínguez, arguing that the centenary event should provide space for more nations to join in the global celebration. Al Jazeera+1
🔍 What the Proposal Entails
If FIFA approves the expansion:
-
The tournament would include 64 national teams, an increase of 16 additional teams beyond the 48 already planned. Al Jazeera+1
-
It could feature 128 matches, far more than the current World Cup formats. The Independent+2Reuters+2
-
Qualifying slots would expand, potentially allowing all 10 CONMEBOL member countries direct or guaranteed access through playoffs — including nations like Venezuela, who have never before qualified. Al Jazeera+1
-
The centennial edition would remain unique: the increased size might be a one-off, returning to fewer teams (likely 48) in future tournaments. Reuters+1
⚠️ Support, Concerns & Opposition
The proposal has generated both enthusiasm and skepticism across the global football community:
Support for Expansion
-
CONMEBOL supports it strongly, emphasizing inclusivity and global celebration. President Domínguez has framed the 64-team proposal as a way to ensure “nobody on the planet is left out of the party.” Al Jazeera+1
-
The FIFA Council is required to analyze any proposal from its members, and this one was “spontaneously raised” by a delegate from Uruguay, demonstrating some level of openness to debate. Dawn+1
Voices of Concern
-
UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin has publicly called the idea a “bad idea,” citing concerns over the integrity of qualifiers, match quality, and strain on players and schedules. SuperSport+1
-
The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) has expressed worries about logistical chaos and tournament length. Dawn+1
-
Concacaf president Victor Montagliani has also opposed the idea, indicating that the move could damage not only the World Cup itself but the broader football ecosystem. The Guardian+1
🌍 Implications for Africa, Asia & Smaller Nations
-
Existing concerns include travel distances, increased budgetary and infrastructural demands, and potentially less rest for players due to more matches.
-
However, for many smaller or underrepresented nations, a 64-team World Cup could be transformative — offering more chances to qualify, greater exposure, and potential financial rewards from participation and hosting.
-
For continents like Africa and Asia, where competitive national teams often sit just outside qualification spots, this could mean finally breaking through.
🏟️ Logistical, Financial & Sporting Challenges
-
Hosting matches across six countries already places complex demands on transport, stadium readiness, accommodation, and fan movement. Adding more teams means more venues, tighter schedules, and increased risk of burnout for players.
-
FIFA would need to ensure match quality remains high. Critics argue expanding too much dilutes competition if many matches are overly one-sided.
-
There’s also the commercial model: more matches translate to more broadcasting deals and sponsorship income — but also potentially more costs for infrastructure, travel, security, and staging.
☑️ What’s Next: Decision Timeline
-
FIFA has acknowledged the proposal and promised review, but no final decision has been made. Reuters+1
-
Key stakeholders — including federations from Europe, CONMEBOL, AFC, as well as government representatives from host nations — will be consulted.
-
FIFA Council meetings later this year are expected to discuss the proposal in more detail. If approved, plans, schedules, qualifying slots, and regulations would need updates well ahead of 2030.
🔮 What This Could Mean for the Beautiful Game
-
A one-off 64-team World Cup would mark the 2030 edition as truly historic. It could potentially create stories of underdog triumphs, with nations rarely seen on the biggest stage getting their moment in the sun.
-
For stars, bigger tournaments mean more opportunity, more exposure, but also more matches — demanding squad depth and resilience.
-
For fans, more teams could mean a richer viewing experience, but some worry about fatigue, an oversaturated calendar, and games with mismatched levels of competitiveness.
✅ Almighty FM’s Take
At Almighty FM 103.7, we believe this proposal is bold — perhaps properly bold for a centennial celebration. Expanding the World Cup to 64 teams might come with challenges, but it also has the potential to redefine inclusivity and global footballing unity.
Whether you love the idea or worry about its implications, the mere fact that FIFA is entertaining it shows how the landscape of the game is changing.
Would it be perfect? Maybe not. But in 2030, when the World Cup celebrates 100 years of passion, glory, heartbreak, and unforgettable moments, it deserves to be more than just another tournament.
🔍 Final Thought
As the world watches, we ask: is the 2030 World Cup going to be a celebration that pulls everyone in — or an expansion too far? The voices are loud on both sides. Soon enough, FIFA will issue its verdict. Until then, we wait — and hope for a World Cup that honours its history while embracing its future.
📻 Stay tuned with Almighty FM 103.7 – The Power House of Sports – for full updates, expert insights, and all angles on the 2030 World Cup expansion debate.