Judicial independence in Ghana has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years as court rulings in politically sensitive cases continue to divide opinion. While democracy is meant to provide a peaceful path to resolving conflict, the persistence of political violence and controversial court decisions has left many Ghanaians questioning whether justice truly serves all citizens equally. From electoral clashes to media freedom violations, several cases have exposed what critics describe as leniency, political interference, and selective accountability in Ghana’s judicial system.
1. Ablekuma North Electoral Violence (2025)
Eight men were convicted for violent disturbances during a parliamentary re-run in 19 polling stations, including an assault on former Minister Hawa Mavis Koomson.
Each was fined GH¢6,000 or risked a two-year prison sentence. Critics, including IMANI Africa’s Franklin Cudjoe, condemned the punishment as too lenient to deter future electoral violence.
2. UTV Studio Invasion (2023)
Sixteen men linked to the ruling NPP stormed UTV studios during a live broadcast of United Showbiz, demanding the removal of a guest critical of the party.
Though convicted of conspiracy, rioting, and assault, each was fined just GH¢2,400. Media watchdogs, including MFWA, blasted the ruling as inadequate, warning it weakened protections for journalists.
3. Delta Force Courtroom Attack (2017)
The pro-NPP vigilante group Delta Force assaulted a regional security coordinator and later stormed a Kumasi court to free 13 members on trial.
Despite charges of rioting and assault, the Attorney General dropped the case in 2018 citing insufficient evidence. The move drew accusations of political shielding and deepened concerns about impunity for vigilante groups.
4. The Montie 3 Case (2016)
Three NDC affiliates were jailed for contempt after threatening Supreme Court justices on radio. But President John Mahama pardoned them a month later under Article 72 of the Constitution.
The pardon ignited a constitutional debate, with critics arguing it undermined judicial independence. The Supreme Court later upheld the president’s authority to pardon, though two justices dissented.
These four cases illustrate a troubling pattern: politically charged crimes often end with acquittals, reduced charges, or fines that many view as inadequate. Such outcomes weaken public trust in the judiciary, embolden vigilante groups, and threaten the rule of law.
According to Afrobarometer, 62% of Ghanaians say they have little or no trust in the courts, more than double the figure in 2005. Unless Ghana’s judiciary can assert greater independence and consistently apply justice, the country risks undermining democratic stability and encouraging further political violence.
Strengthening judicial independence in Ghana is therefore not just a legal necessity—it is essential for safeguarding democracy and restoring faith in state institutions.
source: myjoyonline
